Barron’s, which like MarketWatch is owned by Dow Jones & Co., provoked a minor stir on financial Twitter earlier this week when it published an article declaring that U.S. stocks have likely hit their lows for the cycle, even if more turbulence could follow in the months ahead.
width: 100% !important;
The piece provoked some strong opinions on financial Twitter, as it was extolled by bulls and denounced by bears, but the timing was fortunate regardless.
Just a few hours after the piece was published online, minutes from the Federal Reserve’s November policy meeting sent stocks hurtling higher ahead of the Thanksgiving holiday, spurred by the notion that senior Fed officials appeared to favor smaller interest-rate hikes going forward.
Some market strategists have talked up the possibility of a “Santa Claus rally” for stocks into the end of the year. But in a recent piece, Mark Hulbert marshalled some data to suggest that the potential gain for stocks over the next four weeks isn’t actually that significant based on history.
The last six weeks have been kind to U.S. stocks. The S&P 500
has been trading above its 200-day moving average for a couple of weeks. And as the large-cap index has surmounted the 4,000 level, the CBOE Volatility Gauge
known as the “Vix” or Wall Street’s “fear gauge,” has fallen to around 20, one of its lowest levels of the year, which suggests that options traders expect volatility to be subdued over the coming month.
What’s more, the Dow Jones Industrial Average
is on the cusp of exiting bear-market territory, having risen more than 19% from its late-September low.
Some analysts are worried that these recent successes for the stock market could mean that U.S. stocks have become overbought. Independent analyst Helen Meisler made her case for this in a recent piece she wrote for CMC Markets.
“My estimation is that the market is slightly overbought on an intermediate-term basis, but could become fully overbought in early December,” Meisler said. And she’s hardly alone in anticipating that stocks might soon experience another pullback.
Morgan Stanley’s Mike Wilson, who has become one of Wall Street’s most closely followed analysts after anticipating this year’s bruising selloff, said earlier this week that he expects the S&P 500 will bottom around 3,000 during the first quarter of next year, resulting in a “terrific” buying opportunity.
But with so much uncertainty plaguing the outlook for stocks, corporate profits, the economy and inflation, among other factors, here are a few things investors might want to parse before deciding whether an investable low in stocks has truly arrived, or not.
Dimming expectations around corporate profits could hurt stocks
Earlier this month, equity strategists at Goldman Sachs Group
and Bank of America Merrill Lynch
warned that they expect corporate earnings growth to stagnate next year. While analysts and corporations have cut their profit guidance, many on Wall Street expect more cuts to come heading into next year, as Wilson and others have said.
This could put more downward pressure on stocks as corporate earnings growth has slowed, but still limped along, so far this year, thanks in large part to surging profits for U.S. oil and gas companies.
History suggests that stocks won’t bottom until the Fed cuts rates
One notable chart produced by analysts at Bank of America has made the rounds several times this year. It shows how over the past 70 years, U.S. stocks have tended not to bottom until after the Fed has cut interest-rates.
Typically, stocks don’t begin the long slog higher until after the Fed has squeezed in at least a few cuts, although during March 2020, the nadir of the COVID-19-inspired selloff coincided almost exactly with the Fed’s decision to slash rates back to zero and unleash massive monetary stimulus.
Then again, history is no guarantee of future performance, as market strategists are fond of saying.
Fed’s benchmark policy rate could rise further than investors expect
Fed funds futures, which traders use to speculate on the path forward for the Fed funds rate, presently see interest-rates peaking in the middle of next year, with the first cut most likely arriving in the fourth quarter, according to the CME’s FedWatch tool.
However, with inflation still well above the Fed’s 2% target, it’s possible — perhaps even likely — that the central bank will need to keep interest rates higher for longer, inflicting more pain on stocks, said Mohannad Aama, a portfolio manager at Beam Capital.
“Everyone is expecting a cut in the second half of 2023,” Aama told MarketWatch. “However, ‘higher for longer’ will prove to be for the entire duration of 2023, which most folks haven’t modeled,” he said.
Higher interest rates for longer would be particularly bad news for growth stocks and the Nasdaq Composite
which outperformed during the era of rock-bottom interest rates, market strategists say.
But if inflation doesn’t swiftly recede, the Fed might have little choice but to persevere, as several senior Fed officials — including Chairman Jerome Powell — have said in their public comments. While markets celebrated modestly softer-than-expected readings on October inflation, Aama believes wage growth hasn’t peaked yet, which could keep pressure on prices, among other factors.
Earlier this month, a team of analysts at Bank of America shared a model with clients which showed that inflation might not substantially dissipate until 2024. According to the most recent Fed “dot plot” of interest rate forecasts, senior Fed policy makers expect rates will peak next year.
But the Fed’s own forecasts rarely pan out. This has been especially true in recent years. For example, the Fed backed off the last time it tried to materially raise interest rates after President Donald Trump lashed out at the central bank and ructions rattled the repo market. Ultimately, the advent of the COVID-19 pandemic inspired the central bank to slash rates back to the zero bound.
Bond market is still telegraphing a recession ahead
Hopes that the U.S. economy might avoid a punishing recession have certainly helped to bolster stocks, market analysts said, but in the bond market, an increasingly inverted Treasury yield curve is sending the exact opposite message.
The yield on the 2-year Treasury note
on Friday was trading more than 75 basis points higher than the 10-year note
at around its most inverted level in more than 40 years.
At this point, both the 2s/10s yield curve and 3m/10s yield curve have become substantially inverted. Inverted yield curves are seen as reliable recession indicators, with historical data showing that a 3m/10s inversion is even more effective at predicting looming downturns than the 2s/10s inversion.
With markets sending mixed messages, market strategists said investors should pay more attention to the bond market.
“It’s not a perfect indicator, but when stock and bond markets differ I tend to believe the bond market,” said Steve Sosnick, chief strategist at Interactive Brokers.
Ukraine remains a wild card
To be sure, it’s possible that a swift resolution to the war in Ukraine could send global stocks higher, as the conflict has disrupted the flow of critical commodities including crude oil, natural gas and wheat, helping to stoke inflation around the world.
But some have also imagined how continued success on the part of the Ukrainians could provoke an escalation by Russia, which could be very, very bad for markets, not to mention humanity. As Clocktower Group’s Marko Papic said: “I actually think the biggest risk to the market is that Ukraine continues to illustrate to the world just how capable it is. Further successes by Ukraine could then prompt a reaction by Russia that is non-conventional. This would be the biggest risk [for U.S. stocks],” Papic said in emailed comments to MarketWatch.