• Audio
  • Live tv
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
Monday, May 29, 2023
Morning News
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Home
  • News
    • Local
    • National
    • World
  • Markets
  • Economy
  • Crypto
  • Real Estate
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Tech
    • Automotive
    • Business
    • Computer Sciences
    • Consumer & Gadgets
    • Electronics & Semiconductors
    • Energy & Green Tech
    • Engineering
    • Hi Tech & Innovation
    • Machine learning & AI
    • Security
    • Hardware
    • Internet
    • Robotics
    • Software
    • Telecom
  • Lifestyle
    • Fashion
    • Travel
    • Canadian immigration
  • App
    • audio
    • live tv
  • Home
  • News
    • Local
    • National
    • World
  • Markets
  • Economy
  • Crypto
  • Real Estate
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Tech
    • Automotive
    • Business
    • Computer Sciences
    • Consumer & Gadgets
    • Electronics & Semiconductors
    • Energy & Green Tech
    • Engineering
    • Hi Tech & Innovation
    • Machine learning & AI
    • Security
    • Hardware
    • Internet
    • Robotics
    • Software
    • Telecom
  • Lifestyle
    • Fashion
    • Travel
    • Canadian immigration
  • App
    • audio
    • live tv
No Result
View All Result
Morning News
No Result
View All Result
Home Tech Business

Is Twitter’s ‘blue tick’ a status symbol or ID badge? And what will happen if anyone can buy one?

author by author
November 8, 2022
in Business, Consumer & Gadgets
Reading Time: 5 mins read
0 0
A A
0
0
SHARES
12
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterLinkedinReddit
twitter
Credit: Pixabay/CC0 Public Domain

Following Elon Musk’s acquisition of Twitter on October 27, the world’s richest man proposed a range of controversial changes to the platform. With mounting evidence that he is making it up as he goes along, these proposals are tweeted out in a stream-of-consciousness manner from Musk’s Twitter account.

Primarily to raise revenue, one of the ideas was to charge US$8 a month to obtain a verified status—that is, the coveted blue tick badge next to the account handle.

Within the space of a few days, the paid verification change has already been rolled out in several countries, including Australia, under the Twitter Blue subscription service.

More than just verification

According to Twitter, the blue tick lets people know an account of interest is authentic. Currently, there are seven categories of “public interest accounts,” such as government office accounts, news organizations and journalists, and influencers.

Yet this seemingly innocuous little blue icon is far from a simple verification tool in Twitter’s fight against impersonation and fraud.

In the public view, a verified status signifies social importance. It is a coveted status symbol to which users aspire, in large part because Twitter’s approval process has made it difficult to obtain.

That’s partly because the blue tick has a controversial history. After receiving widespread condemnation for verifying white supremacists in 2017, Twitter halted its verification process for more than three years.

There’s a fundamental mismatch between what Twitter wants the blue tick to mean versus how the public perceives it, something the Twitter Safety team itself acknowledged in 2017.

Verification was meant to authenticate identity & voice but it is interpreted as an endorsement or an indicator of importance. We recognize that we have created this confusion and need to resolve it. We have paused all general verifications while we work and will report back soon

— Twitter Support (@TwitterSupport) November 9, 2017

But they didn’t resolve it. When Twitter resumed verifying accounts systematically in 2021, it wasn’t long until the process began to fail again, with blue ticks being handed out to bots and fake accounts.

Moreover, the public is still confused about what the blue tick signifies, and views it as a status symbol.

Lords and peasants

Musk’s stream-of-consciousness policy proposals may reflect his own preference for interacting with verified accounts. Despite his repeated claims of “power to the people” and breaking the “lords and peasants” system of verified versus non-verified accounts, I ran a data analysis of 1,493 of Musk’s tweets during 2022, and found that more than half (57%) of his interactions were with verified accounts.

Evidently, having a verified status makes one worthy of his attention. Thus, Musk himself arguably views the blue tick as a status symbol, like everyone else (except Twitter).

However, Musk’s US$8 blue tick proposal is not only misguided but, ironically, likely to produce even more inauthenticity and harm on the platform.

A fatal flaw stems from the fact that “payment verification” is not, in fact, verification.

Fact from fraud

Although Twitter’s verification system is by no means perfect and is far from transparent, it did at least aspire to the kinds of verification practices journalists and researchers use to distinguish fact from fiction, and authenticity from fraud. It takes time and effort. You can’t just buy it.

Despite its flaws, the verification process largely succeeded in rooting out a sizable chunk of illegitimate activity on the platform, and highlighted notable accounts in the public interest. In contrast, Musk’s payment verification only verifies that a person has US$8.

Just to make this as clear as possible.

What verification means now: We’ve confirmed this person or company is who they say they are.

What verification will mean in the future: I have $8.

Elon could still back out of this, but that’s the fundamental change that he’s proposing.

— Ben Collins (@oneunderscore__) November 4, 2022

Payment verification can’t guarantee the system won’t be exploited for social harm. For example, we already saw that conspiracy theory influencers such as “QAnon John” are at risk of becoming legitimized through the purchase of a blue tick.

Opening the floodgates for bots

The problem is even worse at larger scales. It is hard enough to detect and prevent bot and troll networks from poisoning the information landscape with disinformation and spam.

Now, for the low cost of US$800, foreign adversaries can launch a network of 100 verified bot accounts. The more you can pay, the more legitimacy you can purchase in the public sphere.

To make matters worse, Musk publicly stated that verified accounts who pay US$8 will be granted more visibility on the platform, while non-verified accounts will be suppressed algorithmically.

He believes this will solve hate speech and fake accounts by prioritizing verified accounts in search, replies and mentions. If anything, it will have the opposite effect: those with enough money will dominate the public sphere. Think Russian bots and cryptocurrency spammers.

Consider also that the ability to participate anonymously on social media has many positive advantages, including safety for marginalized and at-risk groups.

Giving users tools to manage their public and personal spheres is crucial to self-identity and online culture. Punishing people who want to remain anonymous on Twitter is not the answer.

Worse yet, connecting social media profiles to payment verification could cause real harm if a person’s account is compromised and the attacker learns their identity through their payment records.

A cascade of consequences

Musk’s ideas are already causing a cascading series of unintended consequences on the platform. Accounts with blue ticks began changing their profile handle to “Elon Musk” and profile picture to parody him. In response, Musk tweeted a new policy proposal that Twitter handles engaging in impersonation would be suspended unless they specify being a “parody.”

Going forward, any Twitter handles engaging in impersonation without clearly specifying “parody” will be permanently suspended

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) November 6, 2022

Users will not even receive a warning, as comedian Kathy Griffin and her 2 million followers discovered when her account was suspended for parodying Musk.

Musk’s vision for user verification does not square up with that of Twitter or the internet research community.

While the existing system is flawed, at least it was systematic, somewhat transparent, and with the trappings of accountability. It was also revisable in the face of public criticism.

On the other hand, Musk’s policy approach is tyrannical and opaque. Having abolished the board of directors, the “Chief Twit” has all the power and almost no accountability.

We are left with a harrowing vision of a fragile and flawed online public square: in a world where everyone is verified, no one is verified.

Provided by
The Conversation

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.The Conversation

Citation:
Is Twitter’s ‘blue tick’ a status symbol or ID badge? And what will happen if anyone can buy one? (2022, November 7)
retrieved 7 November 2022
from https://techxplore.com/news/2022-11-twitter-blue-status-id-badge.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Set of 5 Clipper-mate Pocket Combs 5" All Fine Teeth

Avalon Coconut Body Lotion, 7 Ounce, Coconut, 7 ounces, 7 oz

twitter
Credit: Pixabay/CC0 Public Domain

Following Elon Musk’s acquisition of Twitter on October 27, the world’s richest man proposed a range of controversial changes to the platform. With mounting evidence that he is making it up as he goes along, these proposals are tweeted out in a stream-of-consciousness manner from Musk’s Twitter account.

Primarily to raise revenue, one of the ideas was to charge US$8 a month to obtain a verified status—that is, the coveted blue tick badge next to the account handle.

Within the space of a few days, the paid verification change has already been rolled out in several countries, including Australia, under the Twitter Blue subscription service.

More than just verification

According to Twitter, the blue tick lets people know an account of interest is authentic. Currently, there are seven categories of “public interest accounts,” such as government office accounts, news organizations and journalists, and influencers.

Yet this seemingly innocuous little blue icon is far from a simple verification tool in Twitter’s fight against impersonation and fraud.

In the public view, a verified status signifies social importance. It is a coveted status symbol to which users aspire, in large part because Twitter’s approval process has made it difficult to obtain.

That’s partly because the blue tick has a controversial history. After receiving widespread condemnation for verifying white supremacists in 2017, Twitter halted its verification process for more than three years.

There’s a fundamental mismatch between what Twitter wants the blue tick to mean versus how the public perceives it, something the Twitter Safety team itself acknowledged in 2017.

Verification was meant to authenticate identity & voice but it is interpreted as an endorsement or an indicator of importance. We recognize that we have created this confusion and need to resolve it. We have paused all general verifications while we work and will report back soon

— Twitter Support (@TwitterSupport) November 9, 2017

But they didn’t resolve it. When Twitter resumed verifying accounts systematically in 2021, it wasn’t long until the process began to fail again, with blue ticks being handed out to bots and fake accounts.

Moreover, the public is still confused about what the blue tick signifies, and views it as a status symbol.

Lords and peasants

Musk’s stream-of-consciousness policy proposals may reflect his own preference for interacting with verified accounts. Despite his repeated claims of “power to the people” and breaking the “lords and peasants” system of verified versus non-verified accounts, I ran a data analysis of 1,493 of Musk’s tweets during 2022, and found that more than half (57%) of his interactions were with verified accounts.

Evidently, having a verified status makes one worthy of his attention. Thus, Musk himself arguably views the blue tick as a status symbol, like everyone else (except Twitter).

However, Musk’s US$8 blue tick proposal is not only misguided but, ironically, likely to produce even more inauthenticity and harm on the platform.

A fatal flaw stems from the fact that “payment verification” is not, in fact, verification.

Fact from fraud

Although Twitter’s verification system is by no means perfect and is far from transparent, it did at least aspire to the kinds of verification practices journalists and researchers use to distinguish fact from fiction, and authenticity from fraud. It takes time and effort. You can’t just buy it.

Despite its flaws, the verification process largely succeeded in rooting out a sizable chunk of illegitimate activity on the platform, and highlighted notable accounts in the public interest. In contrast, Musk’s payment verification only verifies that a person has US$8.

Just to make this as clear as possible.

What verification means now: We’ve confirmed this person or company is who they say they are.

What verification will mean in the future: I have $8.

Elon could still back out of this, but that’s the fundamental change that he’s proposing.

— Ben Collins (@oneunderscore__) November 4, 2022

Payment verification can’t guarantee the system won’t be exploited for social harm. For example, we already saw that conspiracy theory influencers such as “QAnon John” are at risk of becoming legitimized through the purchase of a blue tick.

Opening the floodgates for bots

The problem is even worse at larger scales. It is hard enough to detect and prevent bot and troll networks from poisoning the information landscape with disinformation and spam.

Now, for the low cost of US$800, foreign adversaries can launch a network of 100 verified bot accounts. The more you can pay, the more legitimacy you can purchase in the public sphere.

To make matters worse, Musk publicly stated that verified accounts who pay US$8 will be granted more visibility on the platform, while non-verified accounts will be suppressed algorithmically.

He believes this will solve hate speech and fake accounts by prioritizing verified accounts in search, replies and mentions. If anything, it will have the opposite effect: those with enough money will dominate the public sphere. Think Russian bots and cryptocurrency spammers.

Consider also that the ability to participate anonymously on social media has many positive advantages, including safety for marginalized and at-risk groups.

Giving users tools to manage their public and personal spheres is crucial to self-identity and online culture. Punishing people who want to remain anonymous on Twitter is not the answer.

Worse yet, connecting social media profiles to payment verification could cause real harm if a person’s account is compromised and the attacker learns their identity through their payment records.

A cascade of consequences

Musk’s ideas are already causing a cascading series of unintended consequences on the platform. Accounts with blue ticks began changing their profile handle to “Elon Musk” and profile picture to parody him. In response, Musk tweeted a new policy proposal that Twitter handles engaging in impersonation would be suspended unless they specify being a “parody.”

Going forward, any Twitter handles engaging in impersonation without clearly specifying “parody” will be permanently suspended

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) November 6, 2022

Users will not even receive a warning, as comedian Kathy Griffin and her 2 million followers discovered when her account was suspended for parodying Musk.

Musk’s vision for user verification does not square up with that of Twitter or the internet research community.

While the existing system is flawed, at least it was systematic, somewhat transparent, and with the trappings of accountability. It was also revisable in the face of public criticism.

On the other hand, Musk’s policy approach is tyrannical and opaque. Having abolished the board of directors, the “Chief Twit” has all the power and almost no accountability.

We are left with a harrowing vision of a fragile and flawed online public square: in a world where everyone is verified, no one is verified.

Provided by
The Conversation

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.The Conversation

Citation:
Is Twitter’s ‘blue tick’ a status symbol or ID badge? And what will happen if anyone can buy one? (2022, November 7)
retrieved 7 November 2022
from https://techxplore.com/news/2022-11-twitter-blue-status-id-badge.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
Tags: accountpublic viewsocial media
Previous Post

Guelph man pretended to be lawyer to try help brother avoid impaired driving charge: police

Next Post

Britney Spears Reveals She Suffers Permanent Nerve Damage That Causes Parts Of Her Body ‘To Go Numb’ 

Related Posts

Business

German software giant SAP sells US subsidiary Qualtrics

May 29, 2023
11
Business

Hundreds more tech, biotech layoffs hit Bay Area, Google real estate ally cuts jobs

May 27, 2023
11
Next Post
Britney Spears

Britney Spears Reveals She Suffers Permanent Nerve Damage That Causes Parts Of Her Body ‘To Go Numb’ 

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

POPULAR TODAY

Internet

China’s students leap ‘Great Firewall’ to get homework help from ChatGPT

by author
May 12, 2023
0
15

Chinese schoolchildren are using ChatGPT to slash homework time, but teachers are worried over the possibilities for cheating and plagiarism....

Canadian work experience requirement removed for engineers in Ontario

May 28, 2023
12

Suspect charged after elderly man stabbed and robbed in Markham

May 28, 2023
12

Ukraine president visits front-line areas as new phase nears

May 28, 2023
12
Robinhood launches fiat-to-crypto on-ramp for self-custody wallets and DApps

Robinhood launches fiat-to-crypto on-ramp for self-custody wallets and DApps

May 28, 2023
12

POPULAR NEWS

Dutch government to restrict sales of processor chip tech

May 15, 2023
33
Several travel industry groups said that a travel advisory for Florida issued by the NAACP could harm small businesses in the state, specifically Black-owned ones.

Travel groups say NAACP’s Florida advisory misses the mark

May 23, 2023
22
Here’s what happens to NFTs when you die: Nifty Newsletter, April 12–18

Here’s what happens to NFTs when you die: Nifty Newsletter, April 12–18

May 19, 2023
31
Paul Edmonds (center) with two healthcare providers from City of Hope.

How a Breakthrough Treatment Helped ‘Cure’ This Man of HIV

May 23, 2023
18

‘We are not cutting off trade’: Biden adviser says U.S. seeks to manage competition with China

May 27, 2023
15

EDITOR'S PICK

Local

Mayors, advocates await details on B.C.’s new housing strategy

by author
May 22, 2023
0
11

Stakeholders in B.C.’s housing market are trying to read through the fine print after a sweeping announcement from the B.C....

Read more

Baffinland requests further production increase at Nunavut iron ore mine

Canada announces new investments in settlement services for immigrants

Jenna Ortega Reveals What Fans Can Expect In ‘Wednesday’ Season 2

New LiDAR system pinpoints pedestrian behavior to improve efficiency and safety at intersections

Morning News

Welcome to our Ads

Create ads focused on the objectives most important to your business Please contact us info@morns.ca

PBMIY 3 in 1 15W Foldable Fast Wireless Charger Stand Compatible with iPhone 13/12/11Pro/Max/XR/XS Max/X

Modern Nightstand Bedside Desk Lamp Set of 2 for Bedroom, Living Room,Office, Dorm, Gold

Backup Camera for Car HD 1080P 4.3 Inch Monitor Rear View System Reverse Cam Kit Truck SUV Minivan Easy Installation

OPI Natural Nail Base Coat, Nail Polish Base Coat, 0.5 fl oz

  • Home
  • Audio
  • Live tv
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

© 2022 Morning News - morns.ca by morns.ca.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
    • Local
    • National
    • World
  • Markets
  • Economy
  • Crypto
  • Real Estate
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Tech
    • Automotive
    • Business
    • Computer Sciences
    • Consumer & Gadgets
    • Electronics & Semiconductors
    • Energy & Green Tech
    • Engineering
    • Hi Tech & Innovation
    • Machine learning & AI
    • Security
    • Hardware
    • Internet
    • Robotics
    • Software
    • Telecom
  • Lifestyle
    • Fashion
    • Travel
    • Canadian immigration
  • App
    • audio
    • live tv
  • Login

© 2022 Morning News - morns.ca by morns.ca.

Welcome Back!

Sign In with Facebook
Sign In with Google
Sign In with Linked In
OR

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
Go to mobile version