Massachusetts’ highest court on Tuesday threw out a ballot measure that would have put gig-worker classification before the state’s voters in November, handing gig companies another setback in their efforts to change labor laws to suit their business model.
The measure, which was backed by Uber Technologies Inc.
UBER,
-2.25%,
Lyft Inc.
LYFT,
-0.98%,
DoorDash Inc.
DASH,
+0.14%
and Instacart, promised some new benefits to app-based drivers and delivery workers but would allow them to continue to classify those workers as independent contractors and not employees. The companies were successful in passing a similar version of the ballot measure in California in 2020, but are currently appealing a court decision deeming that law unconstitutional.
The Supreme Judicial Court found that the proposed measure, of which there are two versions, failed to comply with the requirement that measures address related or mutually dependent subjects.
“We conclude that the petitions contain at least two substantively distinct policy decisions, one of which is buried in obscure language at the end of the petitions,” Justice Scott Kafker wrote in the decision in the challenge brought by labor groups, adding that the state attorney general’s certification of the measure was therefore “in error.” Those two policy decisions, according to the court decision, involve the relationship between app-based workers and the companies, and also the network companies’ liability when third parties are injured by app-based drivers’ conduct.
“This is an enormous victory for drivers like me who only want the ability to work hard for fair wages,” said Martin El Kousa, an Uber driver and lead plaintiff in the lawsuit against the proposed ballot measure, in a statement. “We will continue to demand that Uber, Lyft and other app-based companies be held accountable, adhere to our state’s strong labor laws and honor Massachusetts’ long-standing tradition of protecting workers.”
Opponents of the proposed measure, which include drivers groups, civil-rights organizations, consumers advocates and others, had lined up to fight the proposal starting last year, saying they wanted to avoid a repeat of what happened in California, where the companies spent more than $200 million to pass their ballot measure. They estimate that there are more than 100,000 app-based gig workers in Massachusetts.
“Millions of Massachusetts drivers, passengers, and taxpayers can rest easier knowing that this unconstitutional bid by Big Tech CEOs to manipulate Massachusetts law has been struck down by the Supreme Judicial Court,” said Wes McEnany, campaign director for the “Massachusetts is not for sale” coalition, in a statement on Tuesday. “We commend the court for getting it right on this issue and we will remain vigilant and united against any further attempts by Big Tech to water down worker and consumer protections in Massachusetts or beyond.”
Uber, Lyft, DoorDash and Instacart deferred comment to the gig companies’ coalition, which released a statement saying opponents of the measure denied Massachusetts voters a right to weigh in on the issue.
“The future of these services and the drivers who earn on them is now in jeopardy, and we hope the legislature will stand with the 80% of drivers who want flexibility and to remain independent contractors while having access to new benefits,” a spokesman for the companies’ coalition said in a statement. The coalition often cited industry-backed surveys saying most app-based workers prefer to be independent contractors.
See: From treatment of gig workers to tip transparency, the app-based economy could see key changes in 2022
The gig companies contributed nearly $18 million to the proposed ballot initiative in Massachusetts, while the opposition had about $1 million in contributions, according to records filed with the state.
The companies are waging different types of battles in different places over worker classification, pay and benefits. In April, Uber and Lyft got their first legislative victory at the state level, in Washington state, where they secured a different worker category for their drivers that falls short of employee classification. In May, Seattle passed a minimum-wage ordinance for delivery drivers and other gig workers. Uber, DoorDash and Instacart opposed the ordinance.
